SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 339

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Shiv Shankar – Appellant
Versus
Mahavir @ Ghura Turha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Parvez Iqbal Ansari

JUDGMENT :

YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.

Heard Sri Ayub Khan, holding brief of Sri Parvez Iqbal Ansari, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The present petition has been filed seeking to assail the order dated 01.11.2025 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-1, Ballia in Civil Revision No. Nil of 2025 (Shiv Shankar vs. Mahavir & Others), as well as the order dated 11.09.2025 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ballia, in S.C.C. Case No. 139 of 2021 (Mahavir and others vs. Gulab Chand and others).

3. The controversy arises in the backdrop of Application No. 43 Ga-2 moved by the petitioner, who is defendant no. 3 in the suit. By means of the said application, it was contended that the suit, being one for arrears of rent and eviction, was cognizable by a Court of Small Causes and, therefore, having been instituted as a regular civil suit, the plaint was liable to be returned under Order VII Rule 10 C.P.C. for presentation before the competent court.

4. The trial court, however, took note of the factual position that although the suit was initially instituted as a regular original suit, the same had subsequently been transferred, in pursuance of orde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top