Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
Kusum Mishra – Appellant
Versus
U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Thru. Executive Engineer Lko. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition under art 227 challenges appellate reversal of injunction on allotted house. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. illegal parapet and construction beyond 42.21 sqm plot confirmed by report. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 3. trial court grants temporary injunction; appellate court vacates it. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. appellate court interferes only if trial discretion perverse or ignores injunction principles. (Para 11 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. additional evidence permissible in appeals against temporary injunction orders. (Para 12 , 18) |
| 6. no prima facie case for protecting unauthorised construction beyond allotted land. (Para 13 , 16 , 17 , 19) |
| 7. impugned appellate order upheld; writ petition dismissed. (Para 20) |
JUDGMENT :
SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Samarth Saxena, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Puneet Chandra, the learned counsel for the opposite parties - U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad and its officers and perused the records.
2. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioners have challenged the validity of a judgment and order dated 17.01.2026, passed by the learned Additional District Judge/FTC (New), Lakhimpur Kheri in Misc
Appellate court may set aside perverse trial grant of temporary injunction ignoring prima facie absence of case for protecting unauthorized construction beyond allotted plot; additional evidence perm....
The court established that for a temporary injunction, a prima facie case, irreparable loss, and balance of convenience must all be satisfied.
The need for a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable loss for granting injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Point of Law : Grant of mandatory injunction is not prohibited in all cases if a clear prima facie material is placed which justifies a finding that status quo may be altered by one of the parties if....
Suppression of revenue proceedings setting aside relied-upon mutation constitutes unclean hands, disentitling temporary injunction; High Court under Article 227 will not re-appreciate evidence or int....
The judiciary's jurisdiction under Article 227 is limited to ensuring the authority of subordinate courts, not correcting factual errors.
The court maintained that prior judgments and actual possession govern ownership claims in property disputes, reaffirming the principle of res judicata in civil matters.
The court emphasized that a party seeking a temporary injunction must demonstrate a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and risk of irreparable harm, with a failure to do so justifying dismissa....
The supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court can overturn lower court decisions if those decisions reflect procedural errors or ignore critical facts pertaining to ownership and possession.
Grant or refusal of interim relief/temporary injunction - Usually, prayer for grant of an interlocutory injunction is at a stage when the existence of legal right asserted by plaintiff and its allege....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
