HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
Sangeeta Chandra, Amitabh Kumar Rai, JJ.
Sufiyakhatoon and another - Petitioners
Versus
State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Rural Deptt. Lko.and others - Respondents
WRIT - C No. - 9806 of 2024
Decided On : 10-03-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners' ownership claim via 1950 receipt; eviction history. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 14 , 15) |
| 2. abadi land vested in panchayat; temporary encroachments removed. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. post-1948 transfer invalid; tax payment no title conferral. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. eo must consider objections but cannot adjudicate title. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. section 23 does not void post-1948 land transfers. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. abadi land title disputed; insufficient evidence of possession. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 7. writ court cannot resolve disputed title and possession. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 8. writ dismissed; pursue civil suit for title. (Para 46 , 47 , 48) |
JUDGMENT :
Amitabh Kumar Rai, J.
1. Heard Shri Sudeep Seth, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Mohd. Hayan Hasan, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Ram Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the Nagar Panchayat and Shri Prakhar Mishra, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State-Respondent.
2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following main prayers :
"(i) To issue a writ, order or directions in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 6.8.2024 passed by the opposite party no.5/ Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Belhara, District Barabanki contained in Annexure-1 to the writ petition.
(ii) To issue a writ, order or directions in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents especially the officials respondents no.2,3,4,5 and 8 to restore the possession of the land in question bearing Gata No.807 (old Gata no.1023) in favour of the petitioners and further not to change nature of property or make any kind of construction on the petitioners land in question Gata No.807 (old Gata no.1023), and further direct them to remove the board which has been affixed on the land of the petitioner, during the pendency of the present writ petition.
(iii) To issue a writ, order or directions in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents especially the officials respondents not to cancel/delete the name of the petitioners from the records of Nagar Panchayat and restrain the opp. parties from entering the land in the name of Nagar Panchayat/local bodies."
3. It is the case of the petitioners that the father-in-law of the petitioners, namely, Late Shri Abdul Sattar Khan, purchased the land bearing Gata No. 807 (old Gata No.1023), measuring 6,695 sq. ft., from Mrs. Rani Kanij Abid of Riyasat Belhara situated at Bakariya Tola, Ward No.03, Belhara, District Barabanki through a sale receipt dated 31.08.1950. Ever since the said purchase, the petitioners and their family members have been in peaceful and continuous possession of the aforesaid land.
4. It has been submitted that respondent No.5, the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Belhara, District Barabanki issued two notices dated 29.04.2024 to both petitioners, calling upon them to submit documentary evidence in support of their ownership of the aforesaid land within a period of fifteen days alleging therein that the petitioners, on the basis of incorrect information during the course of the survey, got the land in question registered in the register of house tax/water tax.
5. In response thereto, the petitioners submitted a detailed reply dated 10.05.2024 asserting that the land in question had been purchased by their father-in-law and that they are the lawful owners thereof. Along with the said reply, documents relating to title and possession were annexed and several other grounds were also raised opposing the proposed action contemplated under the said notices.
6. Despite the aforesaid reply, respondent no.5, the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Belhara, District Barabanki issued eviction order dated 13.06.2024 directing dispossession/eviction of both the petitioners, requiring them to remove the alleged encroachments from Gata No.807 within three days from the
State of Rajasthan vs. Bhawani Singh and others
Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot resolve disputed title and possession over land; civil suit is appropriate remedy. Section 23(1)(a) of U.P. Zamindari Act bars recognition of post-1948 tran....
Writ jurisdiction is inappropriate for adjudicating disputes regarding property titles; such matters should be resolved through civil courts.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of continuous rent receipts and evidence of possession in validating land settlements under the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950. It also highlights the significanc....
The court held that property ownership disputes must be resolved in civil courts rather than through writ proceedings when title questions are contested.
The main legal point established is the finality of litigation and the legal certainty conferred by the judgment and decree in favor of the petitioner, along with the award from the Permanent Lok Ada....
Right to claim title on basis of adverse possession - Any entry made on basis of adverse possession same was to be communicated to person concerned and person claiming is required to prove that it wa....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.