SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 1032

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
Balmiki Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: M/s Mrigank Mauli, Sr. Adv., Prince Kumar Mishra, Sanjay Kumar.
For the Respondents: Mr.Sajid Salim Khan.

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, J.:–Whether a High Court exercising power of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India can enter into the question of ownership or title in respect of any immovable property and whether the entries in revenue records confer a title on a person(s) are the two main issues which require to be addressed by this Court in the present proceeding. Both the issues are no more res integra and have been conclusively decided by the Supreme Court in negative in a series of decisions.

2. Reference shall be made to the law laid down by the Supreme Court on these issues later after taking note of the nature of relief sought for by the petitioners and rival pleadings and materials brought on record by the contesting parties in that regard.

3. I have heard Mr. Mrigank Mauli, learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners assisted by Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra and Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned Advocates. Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, learned SC 25 has assisted this Court on behalf of the State of Bihar.

4. The land, which is subject matter of dispute, has been described as Khata No. 74, Khesra No. 53 falling in Mauza- Barhari, Thana No. 481 in the District

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top