Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
ATUL SREEDHARAN, SIDDHARTH NANDAN
Satish Chandra Dixit – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. debarment order issued on arbitrary grounds. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. procedures that undermine just decisions are contested. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 3. court highlights unfair treatment and lack of reasonable opportunities. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 19) |
| 4. legal mandates regarding documentation and authority's disregard. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 5. persistent legal mala fides and procedural violations established. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 6. authorities' actions demonstrate intent to injure the petitioner. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 7. complaints were made but no action was taken against officials. (Para 36 , 38 , 39) |
| 8. court asserts the need for justice over technical grounds. (Para 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 9. the petitioner's right is upheld based on unjust treatment. (Para 46) |
JUDGMENT :
SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.
1. Heard Shri V.K. Singh, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Vijay Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Subra Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 30.08.2025 passed by the respondent no.4 by way of which the repres
The court affirmed the importance of natural justice, ruling that repeated debarments were a result of legal mala fides and arbitrary actions by authorities, warranting the quashing of the debarment ....
The court upheld the debarment of the petitioner for failing to submit a performance guarantee on time, affirming the procedural fairness and adherence to the RFP guidelines.
The amendment sought by the plaintiff was a continuous cause of action and did not require a notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Debarment from tender participation must adhere to specific legal guidelines; termination of contract may be justified, but debarment without legal basis is invalid.
Debarment from tender participation requires legal grounds such as conviction for serious offenses, which were not present in this case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
