SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 445

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
VIVEK KUMAR SINGH
Preeti – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Chandra Pal, Udayveer Singh
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT :

VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Yogesh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful marital life.

3. Pursuant to earlier order dated 17.12.2025, learned Standing Counsel has produced instructions which are taken on record and he stated, on the basis of instructions, that marriage of the petitioners was solemnized in Arya Samaj, Bareilly. It is also stated that one F.I.R. as Case Crime No. 596 of 2025, under Sections 87 , 115(2), 351, 352, 351(2) of B.N.S., P.S. Qila, District Bareilly, was registered against the petitioner no. 2, however, after investigation Final Report No. 103 of 2025, was submitted by the Investigating Officer on 18.12.2025 since the victim/petitioner no. 1, was a major girl and she did not support the prosecution story when her statements under Section 180 of B.N.S.S. and 183 of B.N.S, were recorded. All the documents of the petitioners have been verified and no forged documents were appended by the petitioners.

4. This writ petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top