IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SIDDHARTHA VARMA, PRASHANT MISHRA-I
Ranjeet Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The Criminal Appeals No. 9263 of 2023, 9255 of 2023, 9555 of 2023 and 9965 of 2023 have been filed against the judgement and order dated 10.8.2023 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (E.C. Act), Court No. 4, Deoria, in Sessions Trial No. 19 of 2019 (State vs. Devendra Yadav and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 144 of 2018, under Sections 302/34, 352, 504, 506 IPC and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station – Bankata, District – Deoria, whereby the trial court convicted and sentenced the appellants, Devendra Yadav, Dan Singh Yadav, Ranjeet Yadav and Amit Kumar Rai, as follows:
(i) under Section 302/34 IPC, to undergo imprisonment for life along with a fine of Rs. 5,000/- each, and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo two months’ additional imprisonment;
(ii) under Section 352 IPC, to undergo one month’s rigorous imprisonment along with a fine of Rs. 500/- each, and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo five days’additional imprisonment;
(iii) under Section 504 IPC, to undergo six months’ rigorous imprisonment, and in default thereof, to further undergo ten days’ additional imprisonment;
(iv) under Section

















Delay in FIR and pre-FIR inquest not vitiating trial absent prejudice; reliable natural witness testimony, corroborated by medical/weapon evidence, suffices for murder conviction despite inconclusive....
The prosecution must prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt; significant contradictions and procedural irregularities in the FIR undermine the conviction.
The court emphasized that an anti-timed FIR and inconsistent witness testimonies undermine the prosecution's case, leading to the acquittal of the accused.
Offence of Murder - Conviction set aside - No one actually witnessed incident and FIR was lodged on basis of guess-work and suspicion and appellants have been implicated on account of suspicion becau....
The importance of prompt lodging of FIR, credibility of witnesses, and the presumption of innocence in favor of the accused were central legal principles established in the judgment.
The court emphasized that delay in lodging an FIR must be satisfactorily explained; failure to do so may lead to acquittal if the prosecution cannot establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.