Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
JASPREET SINGH
Transrail Lighting Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
JASPREET SINGH, J.
IA No. 3 of 2025 and IA No. 4 of 2025
1. The instant application for recall has been moved by the petitioner along with an application seeking condonation of delay, whereby the petitioner prayed that after condoning the delay the order dated 17.07.2025 and 07.08.2025 be recalled and its consequence would be that the mandate of nominee arbitrator appointed by this Court, on behalf of the respondents, in terms of Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, 'the Act of 1996') would be terminated.
2. Notices were issued on the aforesaid application on 26.11.2025 and in furtherance thereof the respondents have filed their objections on 12.03.2026.
3. Shri Abhinav Kumar Mathur and Ms. Sushmita Mukharjee, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had preferred a petition under Section 11(6) of the Act of 1996 and the Court while exercising its power under Section 11(4) of the Act appointed a nominee arbitrator on behalf of the respondents.
4. It was submitted that the parties had entered in a contract which contained an arbitration clause. However, special conditions of contract prescribed appointment of a Sole Arb
The High Court lacks jurisdiction to review an order passed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the Act is a self-contained code and the Court becomes functus officio u....
The judicial nature of proceedings under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the requirement for providing an opportunity of hearing before the appointment of an Arbitrat....
The interpretation of Section 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is that where the mandate of an arbitrator terminates, a substitute arbitrator shall be appointed according to the ru....
A Settlement Agreement can nullify an existing Arbitration Agreement, preventing disputes from being referred to arbitration.
Point of Law : S.13(2) provides that a party who intends to challenge appointment of an arbitrator shall, within fifteen days after becoming aware of the constitution of the arbitral tribunal or afte....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
