SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(UK) 351

V.K.BIST
Ajay Bhatt – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


ORDER

By means of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the Notification No.178/XXXVI(3)/2013/36 (2)/2006 dated 13th April, 2013, whereby His Excellency the Governor of the State of Uttarakhand, by exercising the powers as provided under Article 213 (1) of the Constitution of India, has promulgated the Ordinance No.01 of 2013 known as The Uttarakhand State Legislature (Prevention of Disqualification) (Amendment) Ordinance, 2013 {hereinafter referred to as the Ordinance, according to which the amended Ordinance shall be deemed to have come into force with retrospective date i.e. 13.03.2012. By this Ordinance, an amendment has been made in Section 3 of the Uttar Pradesh State Legislature (Prevention of Disqualification) Act, 1971(as applicable in the State of Uttarakhand) {hereinafter referred to as the Principal Act}, by inserting five bodies at serial No.58 to serial No.62. In addition to amendment in Section 3 of the Principal Act by inserting five bodies, a saving clause has also been incorporated by the Ordinance, wherein it is provided that notwithstanding such amendments, anything done or any action taken under the Principal Act, shall be deemed to have been done or take

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top