SUDHANSHU DHULIA
Lalit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
“Teaching is not a lost art, but the regard for it is a lost tradition”, wrote Jacques Barzun, Jacques Barzun, ‘Teacher in America’, (1945) in mid 20th century USA, which finds its echo in the callous disregard for teaching and education in Uttarakhand today. The sheer apathy of the powers that be towards elementary education in the State, lie at the heart of the problem before this Court.
2. The petitioners before this Court have prayed for a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus for declaring Rule 7, Rule 9 & Rule 32 of the Uttarakhand Government Elementary Education (Teacher)(Amendment) Service Rules, 2012, as ultra vires to the Constitution of India. The above Rules were incorporated in the main Service Rules vide amendments made in the year 2013 and 2014, respectively. With the said amendments, primarily the “Shiksha Mitras” which are akin to para teachers, are being absorbed as Teachers in Government Primary Schools, inter alia, by exempting a mandatory qual
Bhuwan Chandra and others Vs. State of Uttarakhand & others reported in 2013 (1) U.D. 434
Km. Sandhya Singh & others Vs State of U.P. & others reported in 2013 (3) UPLBEC 2377
Shivam Rajan V. State of U.P. reported in 2015 (3) UPLBEC 2297
Shiv Kumar Sharma v. State of U.P. & others reported in [(2013) 3 UPLBEC 2156
Sanjay Kumar Singh v. State of U.P. and others [(2008) 3 UPLBEC 2195]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.