JUDGMENT

Hon'ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

(Via Video Conferencing)

The petitioner in the present writ petition, who is a plaintiff in the civil suit for specific performance, being Suit No.226 of 2016 Vandana Ahuja vs. Jai Chand Goyal, and others had given a challenge to the impugned order dated 24.05.2021, which was passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Roorkee, District Haridwar; whereby the petitioner's application for preponment of the proceedings being Paper No.84 (C); as well as the application Paper No.85 (C) for directing the parties to maintain status quo, has been rejected.

2. Before dealing with the respective arguments of the counsel for the parties, few relevant facts, which become relevant for consideration by this Court are; that the petitioner/plaintiff, had instituted the suit for specific performance of his agreement for sale on 15.10.2016, which according to him was executed in his favour by respondent nos.1 and 2 on 27.06.2016. While on the other hand the purchasers i.e. respondent nos.3, 4 & 5 from the seller, respondent nos.1 and 2 had contend that they are the purchaser of property in dispute by virtue of the registered sale deed dated 05.10.2016, which