Back
RAVINDRA MAITHANI
SANJAY SINGH YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for quashing the F.I.R. No.184 of 2019, under Section 420 IPC, P.S. Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar, on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. According to the F.I.R. petitioner no.5 Omveer Singh Yadav and petitioner no.2, Neeru Yadav formed a Samiti and about 200 persons were associated with it. One of the purposes was to assist the poor girls in their marriage. But subsequently the petitioners and co-accused cheated members and did not return the money. Respondent no.3, Mohd. Bilal is the first informant.
4. A joint compounding application also been filed by the parties, which is supported by the affidavits of the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.3. Petitioner no.1-Sanjay Singh Yadav, petitioner no.2-Neeru, petitioner no.3 Vinod Yadav, petitioner no.4-Raju Kashyap and petitioner no.7 Inderpal Singh are present in person before this Court duly identified by Mr. I.D. Paliwal, Advocate. A Lakshman Singh Turaiha, deposed as a pairokar to petitioner nos.5 & 6, who are in jail.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
