Back
RAVINDRA MAITHANI, ALOK SINGH
VIPIN KUMAR PANWAR @ BABLU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Challenge in this appeal is judgment and order dated 11.02.2019 in Sessions Trial No.165 of 2009, State vs. Francis @ Jugal Kishore and others, passed by the Court of learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Dehradun. By the impugned judgment and order the appellants have been convicted under Section 302 read with 34 IPC, 394 read with 34 IPC, 411 IPC and 201 read with 34 IPC and sentenced as hereunder:-
(i) Under section 302 read with 34 IPC imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.5,000/- each. In default of payment of fine to undergo imprisonment for a further period of two months.
(ii) Under Section 394 read with 34 IPC rigorous imprisonment for five years and a fine of Rs.2000/- each. In default of payment of fine to undergo imprisonment for a further period of two months.
(iii) Under Section 411 IPC rigorous imprisonment for two years.
(iv) Under Section 201 read with 34 IPC rigorous imprisonment for two years and a fine of Rs.2000/- each. In default of payment of fine to undergo imprisonment for a further period of two months.
All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.
2. Briefly stated, according to the prosecution deceased
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
