Back
RAVINDRA MAITHANI
SANJEEV TIWARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “the Code") has been filed to quash and set aside the order dated 26.11.2016, passed in Misc. Application No. 468 of 2016, Sanjeev Tiwari Vs. K.S. Rana and others, by the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar (for short “the Case") as well as judgment and order dated 16.05.2017, passed in Criminal Revision No. 292 of 2016, Sanjeev Tiwari Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others (for short “the revision"). By the impugned order dated 26.11.2016, an application filed by the petitioner under Section 156 (3) of the Code has been rejected and this order has been confirmed in the revision.
2. Facts necessary to resolve the controversy are briefly stated as hereunder:-
The petitioner filed an application under Section 156 (3) of the Code for investigation. Petitioner is an Executive/Manager of M/s General Power Company Limited (for short “the company"). According to the application, the company took a loan from Punjab National Bank, Branch Pilikothi, Khurja, Bulandshahr (U.P.) (for short “the Bank"). The Bank suddenly closed the credit limit of
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
