RAVINDRA MAITHANI
PANKAJ CHAUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Per: Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was initially filed for quashing of the FIR No. 198 of 2021, under Sections 147, 153A, 504 & 506 IPC and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short, “the Act"), Police Station Jhabrera, District Haridwar and related reliefs. During the pendency of petition, charge sheet was submitted in the case. Thereafter, by way of amendment, the petitioners have also sought quashing of the charge sheet as well as the cognizance order 22.07.2021, passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Haridwar, in Special Sessions Trial No. 19 of 2021, State of Uttarakhand Vs. Pankaj Chaudhary and another.
2. Facts necessary to consider the controversy, briefly stated, are as hereunder:-
Respondent no. 3 filed an FIR on 19.05.2021, at 09:48 P.M. at Police Station Jhabrera, under Sections147, 153A, 504 & 506, IPC and Section 3(1)(x) of the Act. According to it, on that date, Deshraj Karnwal (“the victim"), a Member of Legislative Assembly visited Primary Health Centre (for short, “PHC"), Jhabrera at about 11:30 A.M. When the victim wa
Amulya Kumar Behera Vs. Nabaghani Behera and others
Hitesh Verma Vs. State of Uttarakhand & anr (2020) 10 SCC 710.
Manik Taneja and another Vs. State of Karnataka and another, (2015) 7 SCC 423
Parminder Kaur Vs. State of Punjab
Prithvi Raj Chauhan Vs. Union of India & ors
State of Bihar & anr Vs. P.P. Sharma I.A.S. & anr
State of Haryana & Ors Vs. Bhajan Lal & Ors
State of Karnataka vs. M. Devendrappa & anr
State of Punjab Vs. V.K. Khanna and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.