SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 787

MANOJ K.TIWARI
AMIT SAJWAN – Appellant
Versus
EXCISE COMMISSIONER – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. T.S. Phartiyal, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel

JUDGMENT

By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:-

“1. A writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dated 18-08-2006 passed by Respondent No.1 and order dated 29-11-2005 passed by Respondent No. 2.

2. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to remit Rs. 20,33,339.00 which have been deposited by the Petitioner before Respondents baring the period for which the Petitioner was actually allowed to run the country liquor shop i.e. one month.

3. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to suitably compensate the petitioner for financial loss incurred by the petitioner.

4. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents not to initiate any recovery proceedings against the petitioner."

2. According to the petitioner, in the year 2005, he was permitted to open a country liquor shop at Zero Point, Kempty Road, Mussoorie, District Dehradun and the shop was opened by him on 06.06.2005, but after nine days, Competent Authority asked petitioner to close the shop and shift it to some other location. It is further, the case o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top