Back
VIPIN SANGHI, SANJAYA KUMAR MISHRA
Govind Nath – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VIPIN SANGHI, J.
Miscellaneous applications (IA Nos.13152 of 2021 and 13153 of 2021) are allowed, and the counter-affidavit filed by respondent no.1 and rejoinder-affidavit to the counter-affidavit of respondent no.1 are taken on record.
2. Petitioner, admittedly, is a public servant. The reliefs sought in the writ petition are as follows:-
II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to prepare the pension paper of the petitioner and pay him pension regularly and pay the other retiral dues with 18% interest calculating his entire service from 14.12.1979.
III. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to pay the amount forcibly recovered from the petitioner’s salary of the month September and October, 2018 without any notice to him.
IV. Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances in nature of justice and equity.”
3. The said reliefs squarely fall for consideration within the jurisdicti
Jurisdiction of the court to consider reliefs sought by a public servant in a pension dispute.
The jurisdiction of the court to decide on the reliefs sought by a public servant and the eligibility for promotion based on ACRs and withheld increments.
Jurisdiction of the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal over matters related to public servant promotions.
The court's decision was influenced by the nature of the dispute related to the conditions of service of public servants and the availability of an alternate efficacious remedy.
The court emphasized the availability of an alternate efficacious remedy before the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal for adjudication of disputes related to the conditions of service of public se....
The court's decision was influenced by the principle that disputes related to the conditions of service of a public servant can be effectively adjudicated by the appropriate tribunal, and thus direct....
The court's decision was based on the principle that disputes related to the conditions of service of public servants could be effectively adjudicated by the appropriate tribunal, and therefore direc....
The court's decision was influenced by the principle that disputes related to the conditions of service of public servants should be effectively adjudicated by the appropriate tribunal, in this case,....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
