IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Vipin Sanghi, Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, JJ.
Shree Shaandar Industry Private Limited - Appellant
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand and Another - Respondents
Special Appeal No.284, 285, 286, 287 of 2022
Decided On : 31-08-2022
Plastic Ban - Environmental Protection - Uttarakhand Plastic and Other Non-Biodegradable Garbage (Regulation of Use and Disposal) Act, 2013, Section 3(1) - The court discussed the impugned notification imposing restrictions on the use of plastic and other non-biodegradable materials, emphasizing the environmental threats posed by plastic and the necessity of imposing restrictions. The court rejected the argument that the State Government should have laid down specific norms before imposing restrictions, stating that the impugned notification not only laid down the norms but also imposed restrictions.
Fact of the Case:
The writ-petitioners sought permission to manufacture, store, and transport disposable plastic utensils and kitchenware for export, and challenged the Government notification imposing restrictions on the use of plastic and non-biodegradable materials.
Finding of the Court:
The court dismissed the writ-petitions, upholding the impugned notification and emphasizing the environmental threats posed by plastic and the necessity of imposing restrictions.
Issues: The issues revolved around the legality of the Government notification imposing restrictions on the use of plastic and non-biodegradable materials, and whether specific norms needed to be laid down before imposing such restrictions.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that it was not necessary for the State Government to first issue a notification laying down specific norms before imposing restrictions, as the impugned notification not only laid down the norms but also imposed restrictions.
Final Decision: The appeals were dismissed, and pending applications were disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
Vipin Sanghi, J.
The present special appeals are directed against the common order dated 19.07.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in a batch of writ-petitions including Writ-Petition (M/S) No.1026 of 2021, “Gitanshi Polychem Private Ltd. Vs. State of Uttarakhand & Anr.” whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed all the writ-petitions wherein the writ-petitioners had sought a direction to the respondents to allow them to manufacture, store, carry, transport in order to export their products i.e. disposable utensils of plastic and kitchenware outside the State of Uttarakhand and in the international market where it is allowed to be used.
2. The petitioners also sought the quashing of the Government notification dated 16.02.2021 issued by the State Government in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3(1) of the Uttarakhand Plastic and Other Non-Biodegradable Garbage (Regulation of Use and Disposal) Act, 2013.
3. The learned Single Judge referred to the order passed by us in WPPIL No.93 of 2022 by placing reliance on the impugned notification dated 16.02.2021. The learned Single Judge observed that it is no more in dispute that plastic and polythene both are major threat to the environment and ecological balance. Specially, in Sub-Himalayan region which consists majority of the State of Uttarakhand, the ecology is very delicate which requires proper nursing and proper diligence on the part of the authorities from causing further damage.
4. The submission of the learned counsel for the appellants is that the learned Single Judge has not considered the legal submissions advanced by the petitioner premised on the language of Section 3 of the aforesaid Act (The Act).
5. Mr. Gupta submits that the said Act in Section 3(1) reads as follows:-
“3. Restriction or prohibition on use of certain thing manufactured from non-biodegradable material.-(1) The State Government may, by notification, impose restriction or prohibition on the manufacture, sale, purchase, storage, distribution and use of any plastic or other non-biodegradable material within the State of Uttarakhand, which is contrary to the norms as the State Government may, by notification, specify.”
6. He submits that prior to issuance of the impugned notification dated 16.02.2021 by reference to Section 3(1) of the aforesaid Act, it was necessary for the State Government to lay down the norms by notification so as to, inter alia, impose restrictions on violation in the manufacture, sale, purchase, storage, distribution and use of plastic or other non-biodegradable material within the State of Uttarakhand, which is contrary to such norms. He submits that no norms have been laid down by the State Government and straightway the impugned notification dated 16.02.2021 has been issued.
7. At this stage, we may notice the relevant extracts of the notification dated 16.02.2021
“Whereas, plastics are non-biodegradable and cause threat to the ecological system as they reduce the fertility of soil and thereby hamper the growth of plants, choke drains and sewer resulting in overflowing of gutters and if swallowed by cattle and wild animals, they may cause death by obstructing their intestine;
And whereas, the colour pigments present in the plastic contaminate food products wrapped in them and cause health hazards and some of it even carcinogenic;
And whereas, plastic products take hundreds of years for degradation, as they are not biodegradable, they also block the rain water infiltration into the soil hindering recharge of ground water;
And whereas, the plastic bags when discarded can get filled with rain water offering ideal breeding ground for vector borne diseases like malaria, dengue etc. and burning of plastics also releases carcinogenic and toxic substances like dioxins, furans and hydrogen cyanide, which pollute air as well as cause severe and chronic health problems;
And whereas, plastic waste and micro plastic cause danger to fresh and marine water biodiversity and also h
AI
The impugned notification imposing restrictions on the use of plastic and non-biodegradable materials was upheld by the court, emphasizing the environmental threats posed by plastic and the necessity....
The court upheld the imposition of the fine based on the legal provisions and notifications banning the use of plastic material.
Inclusion of non-woven bags in list of banned single use plastic items by Government Orders without regard to GSM standards and in violation of provisions of Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016 is h....
Important points:Detection of sufficiently large number of cases of fake composite carry bags entering the markets in the State, as would render it practically impossible for the State to prevent tra....
Fundamental right to clean environment of public at large- a right relatable to fundamental right to life under Article 21 of Constitution.
The court emphasized the duty to implement effective measures for environmental protection, mandating a ban on single-use plastics in high-traffic tourist areas and official functions, underpinned by....
Therefore, it cannot be said that though the goods were imported during the subsistence of Rules, 2019 cannot be used even after the petitioners are permitted to use in view of the change in policy o....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.