SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, JJ.
Tamil Nadu And Puducherry Paper Cup Manufactures Association – Appellant
Versus
State Of Tamil Nadu & Ors. – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 8536 of 2022 With Civil Appeal No(S). 8537-8538 of 2022
Decided on : 20-10-2023
Environment Protection Act, 1986 - Section 5 - The ban on reinforced paper cups was imposed under the power of the State Government delegated by the Central Government under Section 5 of the Environment Protection Act. The ban on non-woven plastic bags should be reconsidered in light of the amended rules.
Fact of the Case:
The appellants challenged a government order banning the manufacture, storage, supply, transport, sale, distribution, and use of 'one time use and throwaway plastics'. The ban included reinforced paper cups and non-woven plastic bags. The appellants argued that the ban was arbitrary and disproportionate. The government relied on expert reports that concluded that the banned products were non-biodegradable and harmful to the environment. The High Court upheld the ban, and the appellants appealed to the Supreme Court.
Finding of the Court:
The Supreme Court held that the ban on reinforced paper cups was justified as they were non-biodegradable and difficult to recycle. The court rejected the argument that the ban was arbitrary and disproportionate. However, the court found that the ban on non-woven plastic bags deserved further scrutiny. The court directed the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board to reconsider the ban on non-woven bags in light of the amended rules.
Ratio Decidendi: The ban on reinforced paper cups was justified as they were non-biodegradable and difficult to recycle. The ban on non-woven plastic bags deserved further scrutiny and should be reconsidered in light of the amended rules.
Result: The Supreme Court upheld the ban on reinforced paper cups and directed the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board to reconsider the ban on non-woven plastic bags.
JUDGMENT :
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.
1. These appeals were heard finally, with the consent of the parties. The appellants are aggrieved by a common judgment1[Judgment dated 11.07.2019 in WP No. 3984/2019.] of the Madras High Court, by which their writ petitions challenging a government order2[G.O.Ms No. 84 dated 25.06.2018 w.e.f. 01.01.2019 (hereafter referred to as ‘Government Order’).] banning manufacture, storage, supply, transport, sale, distribution, and use of ‘one time use and throwaway plastics’, was dismissed. The appellants before this court are an association representing manufacturing units involved in the manufacture of ‘reinforced’ paper cups, and a manufacturer of non-woven plastic bags, respectively.
Facts
2. The Environment and Forest Department of the Government of Tamil Nadu issued the Government Order in question, in exercise of its power under Section 5 of the Environment Protection Act, 1986 (‘EPA’) on 25.06.2018 and it was to take effect from 01.01.2019. The Government Order included directions, banning manufacture, storage, supply, transport, sale, distribution, or use of “use and throwaway plastics” – which as per Explanation 2, included plastic carry bags, plastic flags, plastic sheets used for food wrapping, spreading on dining table, etc. plastic plates, “plastic coated teacups” and plastic tumbler, water pouches and packets, and plastic straws, regardless of thickness. Pertinently, non-woven bags were not expressly mentioned until a clarification dated 08.12.2018 issued by the state government, brought them within the scope of the ban.
3. The directions also contained exemptions for plastic carry bags produced exclusively for export purposes by an industry in an SEZ or EOU; plastic bags which constitute or form an integral part of packaging in which goods are sealed prior to use at manufacturing/processing units; plastic bags and sheets used in forestry and horticulture nurseries against the orders from the government departments; plastic used for packing dairy products, oil, medicine, and medical equipment; and carry bags made of “compostable plastics” 3[See Explanation 5 for definition.] (as per regulations). 4[During the pendency of litigation, there have been further amendments to the Government Order; by Notification dated 05.06.2020, the State removed the exemption for plastic bags used for packaging goods sealed prior to use at processing units, and added a further direction to the effect that alternatives to the use and throw plastics (other than compostable plastics) shall be examined and tested by the Central Institute of Plastic Engineering and Technology (CIPET) and necessary approval to be obtained from the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB).] Pursuant to the Government Order, a Steering Committee headed by the Chief Secretary of the Government of Tamil Nadu, was constituted to monitor and implement the Notification.
4. The appellant paper cup association made a representation on 05.09.2018 to the Government to reconsider and exclude them from the ban. Pursuant to this, an Expert Committee was constituted on 25.09.2018 to study and furnish a report on the compostable properties of paper cups and compostable plastics. The Expert Committee discussed the properties of LDPE coated paper cups, and alternative bioplastics which were biodegradable. It concluded that the LDPE made such cups non-biodegradable, but recyclable. However, due to insufficient collection mechanism or failure on the part of extended producer responsibility - they are not being recycled.
5. The petitioner association was also invited for a personal hearing on 14.11.2018, during which they contended that the use of reinforced papercups had not been banned in other states (such as Maharashtra, Karnataka and Orissa) which had also implemented a ‘plastic ban’. The association’s representation was rejected on 08.12.2018 by the TNPCB on two grounds: firstly, that this policy to ban one time use and throwaway plastics was to safe
AI
Fundamental right to clean environment of public at large- a right relatable to fundamental right to life under Article 21 of Constitution.
Important points:Detection of sufficiently large number of cases of fake composite carry bags entering the markets in the State, as would render it practically impossible for the State to prevent tra....
The court upheld the imposition of the fine based on the legal provisions and notifications banning the use of plastic material.
The impugned notification imposing restrictions on the use of plastic and non-biodegradable materials was upheld by the court, emphasizing the environmental threats posed by plastic and the necessity....
The court established that manufacturers must register under the Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016, to ensure compliance and prevent environmental hazards.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.