SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Baljeet Singh @ Jeeta – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
The matter was heard on 26.08.2022 and it was placed today for dictation of judgment.
2. Few facts which are required to be considered before venturing into the legal prospective with regards to the impugned order of 01.12.2021, resulting into rejection of an application under Section 91 of Cr.P.C. by the court of First Additional Sessions Judge, in Sessions Trial No.87 of 2018 State vs. Harjeet Singh & Others.
3. An FIR No.10 of 2018 was registered on 07.01.2018 with regards to the involvement of the named accused persons therein, in the FIR for commission of offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 307 IPC. At this stage the detailed analysis about the set of allegations levelled in the FIR, in relation to the involvement of each of the co-accused persons is not required to be ventured into by this Court, on its merits for the reason being, that the counsel for the applicant has confined her arguments qua the impugned order, rejecting the application which was preferred by the applicant co-accused, under Section 91 of the Cr.P.C. which find
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.