JUDGMENT :

Ravindra Maithani, J.

The revisionist proposes to challenge an order dated 07.05.2022, passed in Misc. Case No.252 of 2021, Ramchandra vs. Sanjay Kumar and others, passed by the court of Special Sessions Judge, Udham Singh Nagar (for short, “the case”). By it, an application filed under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, “the Code”) has been rejected.

2. A Delay Condonation Application (IA) No.1 of 2022 has also been filed.

3. The grounds for delay is that the revisionist due to jaundice, could not take the action on time and the revision is delayed by 18 days.

4. Having considered the ground, this Court is of the view that the delay in filing the revision may be condoned and the matter may be heard on admission. Accordingly, the delay condonation application is allowed. The delay in filing the revision is condoned.

5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6. According to the application Section 156(3) of the Code filed by the revisionist, he was working in a company named S.I. Auto Pack Unit-2, SIDCUL, District Udham Singh Nagar (for short, “the complaint”). On 27.09.2019, he was dismissed from the service along with 09 o