SANJAYA KUMAR MISHRA
Ajay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
ORDER :
1. By filing this writ application, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction to respondent no. 1 against the respondent no. 2 and respondent no. 3 for respective consequential disciplinary as well as criminal law at the behest of complainant/respondent no. 3 naming the petitioner deliberately falsely in the First Information Report No. 0073/2022 dated 18.08.2022 under sections 376(2)(g) of IPC registered at Police Station-Banbasa, District- Champawat.
(iii) Issue a writ order or directions in the nature of certiorari to call for the record and to quash the impugned First Information Report No. 0073/2022 dated 18.08.2022 under sections 376(2)(g) of IPC registered at Police Station- Banbasa, District-Champawat.
(iv) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent nos. 1 & 2 not to harass or take a
Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and Another
D.K. Basu; Ashok K. Johari vs. State of West Bengal, State of Uttar Pradesh
Hari Krishna Mandir Trust vs. State of Maharashtra
Joginder Kumar vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.