IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd - Appellant
Versus
Mohan Joshi & Others - Respondents
Appeal from Order No.69 of 2018
Decided On : 28-07-2022
Insurance Company - Motor Accident Claim - [Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 149(2)(a), Section 149(2)(c)] - The court discussed the validity of the driving license, insurance policy cover note, and the liability of the insurance company. The court emphasized that the insurance company failed to produce any evidence to substantiate their claim that the driver did not have a valid driving license. As a result, the court dismissed the appeal from the order.
Fact of the Case:
The claimant suffered grievous injuries in a road accident and sought compensation. The insurance company challenged the award, claiming that the driver did not have a valid driving license.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the insurance company failed to provide evidence to support their claim regarding the validity of the driver's license, and therefore dismissed the appeal.
Issues: Validity of the driving license, insurance policy cover note, liability of the insurance company.
Ratio Decidendi: The insurance company failed to discharge its burden of proof regarding the validity of the driver's license, and therefore could not claim that the driver was not driving with a valid license.
Final Decision: The appeal from the order was dismissed, and the statutory deposit made by the insurance company was directed to be remitted to the claimants.
JUDGMENT :
1. The present appeal from order, which has been preferred by the Insurance Company, they are putting a challenge to the impugned award dated 23.112017, as it has been rendered by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/District Judge, Nainital in MACP No.116 of 2011, “Mohan Joshi Vs. Smt. Rajni Kapoor and others”, as a consequence of the culmination of the impugned award, an award of Rs.2,01,391/- has been awarded to the claimants, as a consequence of the injuries, which was suffered by him in an accident, which has chanced, on 12th April, 2010.
2. The brief facts of the case are that, it was the case of the claimants in their claim petition, that on the ill fated day i.e. 12th April, 2010, when he was moving around with his friend Mr. Ramesh Pandey, at Mangalparao, Haldwani, Nainital, and was about to reach near Mandi, he was walking by the left side of the road, when all of a sudden a vehicle i.e. Bus bearing Registration No.UP01 3608, which was alleged to have been driven negligently and rashly; by the Driver of the vehicle, had dashed against him, resulting into the grievous injuries, which was suffered by the claimant resulting into causing fracture in his rib cage bone. He submits, that on suffering of the injuries, and looking to its seriousness he was immediately taken to Soban Singh Jeena Base Hospital, and looking to his serious condition, he was referred for treatment to Sushila Tiwari Medical College, and thereafter to Sai Hospital and thereafter even to Batra Hospital, Delhi. He submits that he remained hospitalized for sufficient long time, and got his treatment and as a consequence of which the expenditure which was incurred by him in the treatment, at the different hospitals, referred thereto, he would be entitled for the grant of claim by way of compensation to the tune of Rs.13,25,000/-, as it was claimed by him in the claim petition.
3. The opposite party no.1 i.e. the owner of the vehicle, had contested the proceedings by way of filing a written statement, and has submitted that on the date of the accident i.e. 12th April, 2010, the vehicle was being plied with all legally valid documents, and hence, the liability, if any, if it was to be fastened, it was to be fastened on the Insurance Company, because the vehicle was duly insured with the appellant/Insurance Company, and at the relevant point of time, when the accident has chanced, the insurance cover was still prevailing for the offending vehicle.
4. While on the other hand, the driver of the vehicle had filed an independent written statement, and he has submitted, that it was rather the claimant, who has negligent while walking around the road side and there was no negligence driving by him. He submits that on the date of the accident, the vehicle was duly insured with the Insurance Company, and he was driving the vehicle with the valid driving licence, and no liability could be fastened upon the owner or the driver of the vehicle, as such.
5. The Insurance Company did contested the proceedings by way of filing the written statement, and apart from the fact that, the factum of the accident stood admitted by them, the Insurance Company didn’t led any evidence, to the contrary that on the date of the accident, the vehicle was not being validly insured with them. The learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, had framed the issues, which are extracted hereunder:-
2. Whether the said accident was not occurred by the aforesaid Bus as alleged in Para-12 of the written statement of respondent no.2?
3. Whether on the date of accident, the owner of the aforesaid Bus was having valid and effective R.C., insurance policy cover note, fitness, permit, tax
The insurance company must provide evidence to support its claims, and failure to do so may result in the dismissal of the appeal.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the liability of the insurance company to pay compensation for accidents involving vehicles insured by them, and the right of the insurance company....
The Insurance Company may initially pay compensation to third-party claimants despite the driver lacking a valid license, with a right to recover from the vehicle's owner.
An insurance company can be held liable to pay compensation in motor accident claims, even if it proves a breach of policy conditions, with the right to recover the amount from the vehicle owner.
The issue of the validity of the driver's license must be raised before the tribunal to be considered in appeal.
Motor Accident Claims - Rash and negligent driving - Without Driving licence - Liability of insurance company – If a driver had a fake driving licence at the time of the accident then the Insurance ....
Insurance companies cannot deny liability to compensate vehicle owners when premiums for personal accident coverage have been collected.
Insurance companies may be liable to indemnify third-party claims even if the driver lacked a valid license, based on principles of social security and judicial precedents.
The onus of proof regarding the validity of the driving license and authorization to drive the vehicle remains with the insurance company, and the violation of insurance policy terms cannot be presum....
The burden of proving the validity of the driving license lies with the owner and driver, and the liability of the insurance company depends on the status of the passenger.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.