SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(UK) 362

SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Brahamdatt Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Neelam Malik – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Siddhartha Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

The brief controversy as it emanates for consideration before this second appellate in the present second appeal, is arising out of the concurrent judgments which had been rendered by both the courts below on 29.04.2019, it was while dismissing the appeal of plaintiff/appellant herein being Civil Appeal No.160 of 2016 Brahamdatt vs. Neelam Malik; as well as the judgment of the learned trial court dated 25.10.2019 rendered in Suit No.454 of 2008 Brahamdatt vs. Neelam Malik, which too stood dismissed in which the plaintiff/appellant herein had put a challenge to the registered sale deed which was executed in favour of the defendants by the registered owner of the property described in it i.e. by Ishwar Chand on 17.06.2008. The plaintiff/appellant herein on 08.08.2008 had instituted a suit before the court of Civil Judge (Sr. Div.) Rishikesh, District Dehradun, Brahamdatt vs. Neelam Malik, wherein he has sought a degree for declaration of the sale date as executed in favour of the defendants on 17.06.2008 in relation to the property more appropriately described at the fo

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top