SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 21

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Sher Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Naveen Chandra Arya, Advocate, Lalit Miglani, Advocate, Sonika Khulbe, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ravindra Maithani, J. - Applicant Sher Singh is in judicial custody in FIR No.01 of 2022, under Sections 8/21/60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, 2012 ('the Act'), Police Station-Lalkuan, District- Nainital. He has sought his release on bail.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. According to the FIR, on 31.12.2022, late in the evening, the applicant was intercepted when he was driving a motorcycle. The applicant tried to run away, but, he was apprehended. He revealed that he had smack. He was given an option under Section 50 of the Act. Thereafter, when search was made before a Gazetted Officer, it is the prosecution case that 316 grams smack was recovered from the applicant.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the case is false; the applicant has no previous criminal history; it is a case of non-compliance of Section 50 of the Act; there is no independent witness; there is no photograph of the alleged recovery; the case becomes false even on the basis of the fact that according to the police, they wrote the recovery memo in the head light of a vehicle as well as with the help of a torch. It is argued that suc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top