SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 83

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Alok Kumar Verma, J.
Neema Rana - Appellant
Versus
Mukkaram Khan & Ors. - Respondents
Appeal From Order No. 51 of 2021
Decided On : 06-01-2023

Advocates appeared:
Amar Murti Shukla, Advocate, P.C. Maulekhi, Advocate, Rajat Mittal, Advocate

The court's decision was based on the appellant-claimant's choice not to pursue the appeal further, leading to its dismissal.

Headnote:

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Appeal under Section 173 - Compensation dispute

Fact of the Case:

The appellant-claimant filed an appeal against the Award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, seeking division of interest amount among claimants. However, during the proceedings, the appellant-claimant decided not to press the appeal.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the appeal as not pressed after the appellant-claimant decided not to pursue the appeal further.

Issues: Dispute over division of interest amount among claimants

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the appellant-claimant's decision not to press the appeal, leading to its dismissal.

Final Decision: The Appeal (AO. No. 51 of 2021) was dismissed as not pressed.

JUDGMENT

Alok Kumar Verma, J. - The present Appeal has been filed by the claimant under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

2. Heard Mr. Amar Murti Shukla, learned counsel for the appellant-claimant, Mr. P.C. Maulekhi, learned counsel for respondent no.3 and Mr. Rajat Mittal, learned counsel for respondent nos. 4 and 5.

3. Mr. Amar Murti Shukla, learned counsel for the appellant-claimant, submitted that the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/IIIrd Additional District Judge, Dehradun has passed the impugned Award dated 06.02.2020 in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 218 of 2017, 'Smt. Neema Rana Vs. Mukkaram Khan and Others', by which, the learned Tribunal has awarded a total sum of Rs.83,86,864 (Rupees Eighty Three Lakh Eighty Six Thousand Eight Hundred Sixty Four) as compensation along with an interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of the petition till its actual payment. He submitted that the learned Tribunal has directed the Insurance Company to pay the whole amount of the said interest to the respondent no.4-Smt. Heera Rana. He further submitted that the said amount of the interest should be divided amongst the claimants, therefore, the present claimant has filed the present appeal.

4. Mr. Rajat Mittal, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 4 and 5, submitted that the respondent no.4, the mother of the deceased and the mother-in-law of the appellant-claimant, has died on 22.12.2022.

5. After the death of the respondent no.4, the mother-in-law of the appellant-claimant, all the successors of the deceased respondent no.4 will be entitled to receive their shares as successors, in accordance with law.

6. After the said submissions, Mr. Amar Murti Shukla, learned counsel for the appellant-claimant, submitted that the appellant-claimant does not want to press the present appeal.

7. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection.

8. The present Appeal (AO. No. 51 of 2021) is dismissed as not pressed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top