SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 90

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Jabir Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Neetu Singh, Advocate, V.K. Gemini, Advocate, Meena Bisht, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ravindra Maithani, J. - Applicant-Jabir Ali is in judicial custody in FIR No. 344 of 2021, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B IPC, Police Station Nanakmatta, District Udham Singh Nagar. He has sought his release on bail.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. According to the FIR, police had information that a gang in the area is active, which deals with the vehicles. They would change the number of the vehicles and in collusion with the Traffic Officers would sell them at a high cost. When a raid was conducted, it is the case of the prosecution that the applicant was arrested and from his possession many vehicles were recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant is a scrap dealer. He has premises where vehicles are parked. There have been no complaints of any individual owner, whose trucks were allegedly recovered by the police.

5. Learned State Counsel would submit that the owners of the trucks were different persons. But, when the Court wanted to know as to whether the trucks are being given in the custody of the owners. Learned State Counsel would submit that still the trucks are in the police custody.

6.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top