Back
DEEPAK MANCHANDA
Baljit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations against petitioner and theft details. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for and against bail. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. considerations for granting bail. (Para 5) |
| 4. bail granted conditionally. (Para 6) |
Judgment
Mr. Deepak Manchanda, J.
Petitioner has prayed for grant of regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in case FIR No.1 dated 03.01.2023, under Sections 379 , 411, 465, 467, 471, 482 IPC registered at Police Station Kiratpur Sahib, District Sangrur.
2. As per the allegations leveled in the FIR lodged on the statement of Gurcharan Singh, he was a driver and had one truck bearing No. PB-12N-0655 Tata 3118 Model 2011, white colour on its front and body being red in colour. On 21.12.2022 in the evening he parked his truck in the parking of Gurudwara Shahi Tibbi Village, Hazara and it was stolen by someone on the intervening night of 22/23-12-2022.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present FIR. He submits that the petitioner is a reputed businessmen in the name and style of Walia Motors for the last about 30 years and has no criminal record and is having clean antecedents. He su
The undue length of custody and lack of evidence warrant the granting of bail during pending trials.
The principle of innocence until proven guilty and the need for evidence to establish complicity were central to the court's decision to grant bail to the petitioner.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
