SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 112

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Vipin Sanghi, Manoj Kumar Tiwari, JJ.
Commissioner, State/commercial Tax, Uttarakhand, Dehradun - Appellant
Versus
M/s Srishti Enterprises, S-64, Shivalik Nagar, Haridwar - Respondent
Commercial Tax Revision No. 6 of 2023
Decided On : 05-01-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mohit Maulekhi, Advocate

The court's decision was influenced by its previous judgments related to the classification of resin powder under the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005.

Headnote:

resin powder - classification - The court dismissed the revision petition based on its previous judgments related to the classification of resin powder under the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005.

Fact of the Case:

The revision is directed against the judgment relating to the Assessment Year 2014-15, which was preferred under Sections 25(7) and 56 of the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005. The issue raised in the present Appeal relates to the classification of resin powder.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the present revision petition based on its previous judgments related to the classification of resin powder.

Issues: The issue raised in the present Appeal relates to the classification of resin powder.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on its previous judgments related to the classification of resin powder under the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the present revision petition based on its previous judgments related to the classification of resin powder.

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, CJ. - The present revision is directed against the judgment dated 01.02.2022 passed by the Commercial Tax Tribunal, Uttarakhand in Second Appeal No. 15 of 2021 relating to the Assessment Year 2014-15, which was preferred under Sections 25(7) and 56 of the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005.

2. The issue raised in the present Appeal relates to the classification of resin powder.

3. The issue raised by the revisionist is squarely covered by our judgment rendered in Commercial Tax Revision Nos. 41 and 42 of 2022 dated 4th August, 2022. We have dismissed the said revision petitions. The said decision was also followed in CTR No. 52 of 2022.

4. Following the said decisions, we dismiss the present revision petition as well.

5. We may observe that though there is delay of 228 days in filing the present revision petition, but since we are dismissing the revision petition on merits, we are not going into the aspect of delay.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top