SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(UK) 426

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Vipin Sanghi, Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, JJ.
Vijay Goel - Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (S/B) No. 696 of 2022
Decided On : 22-12-2022

Advocates appeared:
Davesh Bishnoi, Advocate, Pradeep Joshi, Advocate, T.A. Khan, Advocate, Sadaf, Advocate

The court's decision was influenced by the undisputed claim for pay fixation and arrears of pay under the 7th Pay Commission, and the financial stringency of the respondent Sugar Company Ltd.

Headnote:

Mandamus - Pay Fixation - The court allowed the petitioner's claim for pay fixation and arrears of pay under the 7th Pay Commission, directing the respondent Sugar Company Ltd. to re-fix the pay of the petitioner w.e.f. 01.01.2016 and to pay him the arrears of pay from 01.01.2016 till the date of his retirement.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought mandamus to direct the respondent to fix his pay after giving effect to the recommendations of the 7th Pay Commission and to pay the arrears of difference in pay and employer's contribution to the Provident Fund.

Finding of the Court:

The court entertained the petition despite it falling under the jurisdiction of the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal, as the respondents did not dispute the petitioner's claim for pay fixation and arrears of pay under the 7th Pay Commission due to financial stringency of the respondent Sugar Company Ltd. The court allowed the petitioner's claim and directed the respondent to re-fix the pay and pay the arrears within five months.

Issues: The issues involved the petitioner's claim for pay fixation and arrears of pay under the 7th Pay Commission, and the financial stringency of the respondent Sugar Company Ltd.

Ratio Decidendi: The court decided in favor of the petitioner due to the undisputed claim for pay fixation and arrears of pay under the 7th Pay Commission, and the financial stringency of the respondent Sugar Company Ltd.

Final Decision: The court allowed the petitioner's claim and directed the respondent Sugar Company Ltd. to re-fix the pay of the petitioner w.e.f. 01.01.2016 and to pay him the arrears of pay from 01.01.2016 till the date of his retirement.

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, CJ. - The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to seek the following reliefs:

    i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to fix the pay of the petitioner after giving effect of the recommendations of the 7th Pay Commission w.e.f. 01.01.2016, as made admissible for the employees of the Centralized Services of the Sugar Mills of Co-operative as well as Public Sector.

    ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No. 3 to pay the arrears of difference in pay for the period from 01.01.2016 to 31.12.2018, i.e. the date of superannuation of the petitioner, which accrued to the petitioner on account of his pay fixation, subsequent to the grant of benefits of 7th Pay Commission; as well as difference in retiral dues calculated on the basis of previous pay and new pay fixation as of 31.12.2018.

    iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No. 3 to pay the employer's contribution to the Provident Fund on the enhanced part of the pay for the period from 01.01.2016 to 31.12.2018.

    iv) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No. 3 to pay the interest @ 12% on the arrears of difference in pay for the period that the payment has been delayed.

    2. Though these reliefs squarely fall for consideration by the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal, since the petitioner is a public servant, on account of the fact that the respondents have reported instructions that they do not dispute the petitioner's claim for pay fixation and arrears of pay under the 7th Pay Commission w.e.f. 01.01.2016 till 31.12.2018, when the petitioner superannuated, and that the said payment could not be made on account of financial stringency of the respondent Sugar Company Ltd., we proceed to entertain this petition, and disposed it of.

    3. We, accordingly, allow the first claim made by the petitioner and direct the respondent No. 3 - Sugar Company Ltd. to re-fix the pay of the petitioner w.e.f. 01.01.2016, after giving effect to the 7th Pay Commission report, and to pay him the arrears of pay from 01.01.2016 till the date of his retirement, i.e., 31.12.2018.

    4. The amount shall be paid to the petitioner within five months from today. In case, the amounts are still not paid, the petitioner shall be entitled to interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum from 15.05.2023 onwards till payment of the outstanding dues.

    5. The writ petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top