SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(UK) 472

VIPIN SANGHI
Union Of India Through Chief Engineer, Bareilly Zone – Appellant
Versus
S And S Construction Co. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
V.K. Kaparuwan, Advocate, Shakshi Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, CJ. - The applicant has preferred the present application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act to seek the appointment of an Arbitrator in terms of Para 7(b) on page 112 of the Contract Agreement dated 20.05.2011 read with Condition No. 70 of IAFW-2249 of General Condition of Contract.

2. The parties had entered in the aforesaid Contract Agreement, which contains the Arbitration Agreement in Clause 70. Copy of said Clause has been filed along with the application. Copy of Clause 7(b) referred to above has also been placed on record.

3. The applicant invoked the Arbitration Agreement on 03.06.2020. The applicant suggested names of prospective Arbitrators, one of whom could be appointed as an Arbitrator. The respondent has, however, not responded to the said notice. Consequently, this application has been preferred.

4. The respondent has filed its reply. In the reply the respondent does not dispute the factum of the parties entering into the aforesaid Agreement, which contains an Arbitration Agreement. The respondent has suggested the names of a few persons, one of whom could be appointed as the sole Arbitrator, while stating that a serving o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top