SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(UK) 496

VIPIN SANGHI, MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI
Nishikant Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate, J.C. Pande, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, CJ. - Counsel for the respondent states that the enquiry report has been tendered by the Enquiry Officer to the State Government for its consideration on 14.12.2022. He has tendered in Court documents in this regard with copy to the counsel for the petitioner.

2. In the light of the aforesaid, we dispose of this petition.

3. The respondent should take the final decision in the matter within the next three months. It goes without saying that in case any decision is taken adverse to the interest of the petitioner, it shall be open to him to agitate the same before the appropriate forum.

4. In case, the decision is not taken within three months, it shall be open to the petitioner to press relief No. (II) before the appropriate forum.

5. Interim Relief Application (IA No. 01 of 2022) also stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top