SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 359

INDRAJIT MAHANTY
State of Tripura – Appellant
Versus
Bimal Chakraborty – Respondent


Table of Content
1. compliance timeline for inquiry process (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments on delay and extensions (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. court's analysis on state actions and delays (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. order allowing extension of inquiry timeline (Para 10)

JUDGMENT

Indrajit Mahanty; CJ. - The present I.A. No.01 of 2021 has been filed arising out of WP(C) No.304 of 2021 inter alia seeking a direction for extending the time by at least two months to comply with the directions of this Court dated 30.04.2021 passed in WP(C) No.304 of 2021. Vide judgment dated 30.04.2021 this Court in paragraph-4 of the said judgment directed as follows:

'4. Under the circumstances, it is directed that the respondents shall complete the departmental inquiry against the petitioner within six months from today, i.e. latest by 31.10.2021. In view of these directions, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the prayer for quashing of the suspension order.'

2. Learned counsel for the State has narrated the events which have occurred in the present inquiry proceedings in paragraph-5 of the present application which is quoted hereunder:

'5. That, in the meanwhile, the Inquiring Authority was also placed on compu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top