SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(UK) 491

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Alok Kumar Verma, JJ.
Pooja Devi - Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & Ors. - Respondents
Criminal Writ Petition No. 2305 of 2022
Decided On : 12-12-2022

Advocates appeared:
Vaibhav Singh Chauhan, Advocate, Rakesh Kumar Joshi, Advocate

The fundamental right of adults to marry and the prohibition of taking the law into one's own hands

Headnote:

Marriage - Interim Protection - Fundamental Right to Marry

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner got married against the wishes of her family members, who opposed the marriage due to different castes. She expressed threat perception from her family members.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the police to provide protection to the petitioner as an interim measure, emphasizing the fundamental right of adults to marry each other and the prohibition of taking the law into one's own hands.

Issues: Threat perception from family members due to inter-caste marriage

Ratio Decidendi: Fundamental right of adults to marry, prohibition of taking the law into one's own hands

Final Decision: Interim relief application disposed of, with the direction for police protection and issuance of notices to the family members

JUDGMENT

Alok Kumar Verma, J. - Heard.

2. The petitioner is present in person before this Court. She is identified by Mr. Vaibhav Singh, Chauhan, Advocate.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that Mr. Charan Singh is also present.

4. The case of the petitioner is that she got married to Mr. Charan Singh on 09.06.2019 against the wishes of the respondent nos. 4 to 8, the family members of the petitioner. At the time of the said marriage, the petitioner and her husband Charan Singh were major. They belong to the same faith; but, their castes are different. Therefore, their marriage is being opposed by the private respondent nos. 4 to 8.

5. The petitioner has apprised this Court that she has threat perception at the hands of the private respondent nos. 4 to 8.

6. There is a prima facie proof of the age of the petitioner. The said marriage has been registered with the Registrar, Compulsory Registration of Marriages, Haridwar.

7. Needless to say, it is the fundamental right of the two adults to marry each other, and, merely because the family members are dissatisfied with the marriage, it does not permit them to take the law on their own hands.

8. Therefore, as an interim measure, we direct the Station House Officer, Police Station Jhabrera, District Haridwar, the respondent no. 3, to immediately provide the proper protection to the petitioner, as there is a threat perception at the hands of the private respondent nos. 4 to 8.

9. Issue notices to the respondent nos. 4 to 8.

10. Steps to be taken within one week.

11. Learned Counsel for the State submitted that counter affidavit is not needed, however, he requested ten days' time to get instructions.

12. List on 14.02.2023.

13. Interim Relief Application (I.A. No. 01 of 2022) stands disposed of.

14. Let a certified copy of this order be issued to learned counsel for the parties, today itself, on payment of usual charges.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top