SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 343

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.
Shyam Babu @ Shyam Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and Another - Respondents
Criminal Misc. Application No. 193 of 2023
Decided on : 07-02-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Rajat Mittal, Advocate,
For the Respondent:Mrs. Manish Rana Singh, Mr. Kamlesh Tiwari, Advocate.

The inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure can be exercised to quash criminal proceedings when private disputes are resolved and parties express their desire to not pursue the case.

Headnote:

Inherent Jurisdiction - Criminal Procedure - Quashing of Criminal Proceedings

Fact of the Case:

The accused invoked the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the proceedings of a criminal case pending before the Court.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the accused and the victim had resolved their disputes and filed a joint Compounding Application, expressing their desire to not pursue the criminal case. The Court exercised its inherent jurisdiction to quash the entire proceedings of the case, considering the peace and harmony between the parties.

Issues: Private disputes resolution, Compounding Application, Exercise of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure

Ratio Decidendi: The Court's decision was influenced by the resolution of private disputes between the parties and their joint Compounding Application, leading to the exercise of inherent jurisdiction to quash the criminal proceedings.

Final Decision: The Court quashed the entire proceedings of the criminal case pending before the lower court, and disposed of the application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

JUDGMENT :

Alok Kumar Verma, J.

The applicant-accused Shyam Babu @ Shyam Kumar Yadav has invoked the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 2025 of 2017, “State Vs. Shyam Babu @ Shyam Kumar Yadav”, pending before the Court of IInd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun.

2. Subsequent to submission of charge-sheet, learned Trial Court took the cognizance and passed the summoning order dated 28.05.2017 against the present applicant for the offence punishable under Sections 354Kha, 323, 504 & 506 IPC.

3. Heard Mr. Rajat Mittal, learned counsel for the applicant, Mrs. Manisha Rana Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and Mr. Kamlesh Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent no.2.

4. The applicant-Shyam Babu @ Shyam Kumar Yadav is present through Video Conferencing, and, he is identified by Mr. Rajat Mittal, Advocate.

5. Respondent no. 2-Smt. Leela Sharma is present through Video Conferencing. She is identified by Mr. Kamlesh Tiwari, Advocate.

6. Both, the applicant and the respondent no. 2 submitted that there were private disputes between them and they have resolved their disputes. After resolving their disputes, they have filed a joint Compounding Application along with their affidavits with their free will and without any pressure. The respondent no. 2-Smt. Leela Sharma further submitted that she does not want to pursue the said criminal case. Both, the applicant and the respondent no. 2-informant/victim submitted that after resolving their disputes, they are living in peace and harmony.

7. Learned counsel for the State opposed the Compounding Application.

8. According to the applicant and the respondent no. 2, they are living in peace and harmony, therefore, in the facts and circumstances of this case, it is a fit case, inwhich the inherent jurisdiction of this Court should be exercised to do real and substantial justice.

9. Keeping in view of the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that the ends of justice would be met, if the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 2025 of 2017 “State Vs. Shyam Babu @ Shyam Kumar Yadav”, pending before the court of IInd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun, are quashed.

10. Resultantly, the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.2025 of 2017 “State Vs. Shyam Babu @ Shyam Kumar Yadav”, pending before the court of IInd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun, are, hereby, quashed.

11. The Criminal Misc. Application (No. 193 of 2023), filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top