Chanchal Singh vs State of Uttarakhand

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(UK) 550

PANKAJ PUROHIT
Chanchal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Revisionist : Mr. P.C. Maulekhi.
For the State : Mr. K.S. Rawal, learned A.G.A.

JUDGMENT :

(Pankaj Purohit, J.) :

This revision preferred under Sections 397 & 401 of the Cr.P.C. is directed assailing the judgment and order dated 30.08.2010 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Bhikiyasain, District Almora in Criminal Case No.55 of 2009/2007, whereby the said court has, at the end of trial convicted and sentenced the revisionist as under:-

S. No.	Conviction	Sentence	Fine	Sentence in-default of fine
1.	279 IPC	Six months’ R.I.	-	-
2.	337 IPC	Six months’ R.I.	-	-
3.	338 IPC	Two years’ R.I.	Rs.2,000/-	Three months’ additional imprisonment
4.	304-A IPC	Two years’ R.I.	Rs.2,000/-	Three months’ additional imprisonment

2. Assailing the said judgment, revisionist preferred an appeal, which was decided by the court of Additional Sessions Judge, Ranikhet, District Almora being Criminal Appeal No.22 of 2010. The appellate court vide judgment dated 20.07.2013 although affirmed the conviction of the revisionist under Sections 279, 337, 338, 304-A IPC, however, the sentence imposed under Sections 338 and 3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(UK) 550

PANKAJ PUROHITChanchal Singh – AppellantVersusState of Uttarakhand – Respondent

PANKAJ PUROHIT
Chanchal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent