IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, J.
Smt. Simmy Agarwal - Petitioner
Versus
Chief Education Officer, Nainital & Others - Respondents
Writ Petition (S/S) No. 211 of 2019
Decided On : 04-10-2023
Compassionate Appointment - Termination of Service - Uttarakhand School Education Act 2006, Regulation 25 - The court discussed the provisions of Regulation 25 of Chapter-3 of the 2009 Regulations framed under Uttarakhand School Education Act 2006, which require prior approval of the District Education Officer for terminating the service of an employee in a Government Aided School/College. The court found that the termination of the petitioner's service without obtaining prior approval of the Competent Authority was unsustainable in law.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner's husband, a Class-IV employee in a Government Aided Educational Institution, passed away during employment. The petitioner applied for compassionate appointment and was appointed as Junior Assistant in another college. Subsequently, she was suspended and terminated without the approval of the Competent Authority.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the termination order passed against the petitioner, without obtaining prior approval of the Competent Authority, was unsustainable in law. The writ petition was allowed, and the impugned order was quashed and set aside. The respondents were directed to permit the petitioner to resume duties as Junior Assistant and entitled to all service benefits for the period she remained out of employment.
Issues: The issues revolved around the termination of the petitioner's service without obtaining prior approval of the Competent Authority, as required by Regulation 25 of Chapter-3 of the 2009 Regulations framed under Uttarakhand School Education Act 2006.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of Regulation 25, which mandates prior approval of the District Education Officer for terminating the service of an employee in a Government Aided School/College. The court emphasized that the termination without such approval cannot be sustained in the eyes of the law.
Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the impugned order dated 26.11.2018 was quashed and set aside. The respondents were directed to permit the petitioner to resume duties as Junior Assistant and entitled to all service benefits for the period she remained out of employment.
JUDGMENT :
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Petitioner’s husband was serving as Class-IV employee in a Government Aided Educational Institution, namely, M.P. Hindu Inter College, Ramnagar, who died during the course of employment on 22.03.2013. Petitioner applied for compassionate appointment. Since there was no vacancy in the college where petitioner’s husband was working, therefore, the Chief Education Officer, Nainital directed the management of another Government Aided Inter College, namely, H.N. Inter College, Haldwani to appoint the petitioner on compassionate grounds. Thus, petitioner came to be appointed as Junior Assistant in H.N. Inter College, Haldwani vide order dated 21.07.2017. According to petitioner, she joined duties in H.N. Inter College, Haldwani on 01.08.2017 and, thereafter, she performed her duties as Junior Assistant, however, by an order dated 18.07.2018, she was placed under suspension by the Manager based on frivolous charges and, thereafter, a charge sheet containing four charges was issued to her by the Manager of the concerned college. Ultimately, the Manager, H.N. Inter College, Haldwani passed an order on 26.11.2018, terminating services of the petitioner. Feeling aggrieved by the termination order, petitioner has filed this writ petition, seeking the following reliefs :
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in her service with continuity of service along with all consequential applicable benefits.
(iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to pay the complete salary/substance allowance to the petitioner w.e.f. July 2018 along with 18% interest from the date of its due till the date of its actual realization.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the order of suspension and also the order terminating service of the petitioner have been passed without approval of the Competent Authority. Thus, according to him, the order of termination dated 26.11.2018 is unsustainable in law. He has relied upon the letter dated 28.02.2019 issued by Chief Education Officer in support of his contention that approval of the Competent Authority was not obtained before passing the termination order.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also drawn attention of this Court to the report dated 20.02.2019 submitted by Enquiry Committee constituted to look into charges levelled against the petitioner, which is on record as Annexure No.2 to supplementary affidavit. The said Enquiry Committee had returned a finding that suspension of petitioner is not tenable in the eyes of law. Learned counsel, thus, submits that the management of the concerned college passed the termination order even without waiting for the report of the Enquiry Committee constituted by Chief Education Officer.
4. Counter affidavit has been filed by Mr. Kunwar Singh Rawat, Chief Education Officer, Nainital. Paragraph nos. 7 to 14 of the said counter affidavit are extracted below :
8. That in view of the said letter dated 19-07-2018 of the Respondent No. 3, the office of the answering Respondent has constituted the 02 members enquiry committee consisting of Block Education Officer Ramgarh, Nainital and Principal G.I.C Phoolchaur Haldwani, (Nainital) to enquire about the matter of suspension of the petitioner.
9. That the Respondent No. 3 has terminated the services of the petitioner vide order dated 26-11-2018 and the inf
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the termination of an employee's service in a Government Aided School/College without obtaining prior approval of the Competent Authority, ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a minority institution is governed by some provisions of the Act and Rules, and the prior approval from the competent authority for terminatio....
The court established that the principles of natural justice must be strictly followed in employment termination cases, particularly in the context of private educational institutions, and that the a....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of prior approval for the termination of a Group 'D' employee, as mandated by Rule 21 of the Uttar Pradesh Recognized Basic Scho....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory requirement of prior approval from the Director of Education for termination of an employee of a recognized private school, as provid....
The Education Officer's order cancelling the approval to the petitioner's appointment was illegal and led to the petitioner's wrongful termination, warranting the court's intervention and relief to t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.