SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Arvind Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The respondent No. 2 on 17th November, 2020, had registered the FIR, being FIR No. 587, by naming the present applicant as to be an accused person to be involved for commission of offence under Sections 323, 376, 506 of the IPC.
2. As per the allegation, which were levelled in the FIR, she admits the fact, that she got in touch with the present applicant about three years earlier, when they for first time met at Max Hospital Mussoorie Road, Dehradun, where the present applicant claims was working and gradually they developed their relationship through Facebook and due to which, when they became much closer to each other. She contends that under an assurance of marriage, which later proved to be false, she has established the physical relationship at different hotels and Ashram, as mentioned in the FIR, i.e., Ashok Hotel, Neelknath Hotel, Sriram Ashram, Dehradun Taj, Tehri, Chamba, Dhanaulti and at one of the Hotels at Narendra Nagar.
3. It was contended by the complainant that on 15th July, 2019, at Sriram Ashram, the applicant is said to have placed sindoor on the mang of the victim, and under the pretext of the alleged hoax marriage, which is referred to in the FIR, it is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.