VIVEK BHARTI SHARMA
Pavan Kumar Nath – Appellant
Versus
Rashmi Mukhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This revision has been filed against the order dated 26.07.2021 passed by Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nainital, whereby the application moved by the revisionist under Order 9 Rule 7 read with Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code, has been dismissed.
2. In brief, facts of the case are that the respondent/plaintiff instituted a suit being Civil Suit No.24 of 2014 for recovery of money against the revisionists/defendant in the court of Civil Judge (S.D.), Nainital. The revisionists/defendants put in appearance in the trial court through his counsel and moved application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC. On 27.10.2017, despite repeated calls as none appeared for the revisionists/defendant, the trial court, vide order dated 27.10.2017 passed the order for proceeding ex parte against the revisionists/defendants. Being aggrieved, the revisionists/defendants moved an application under Order 9 Rule 7 of r/w 151 C.P.C. for setting the ex parte decree and to give them opportunity of being heard. Learned Civil Judge (S.D.), Nainital did not find favour to the revisionists/defendants and dismissed the application vide order dated 26.07.2021. Hence, this revision.
3. Learned counsel for th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.