Back
SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Satendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
Understood. Please provide the legal document content (inside
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. definition of offences under the immoral traffic (prevention) act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. legislative intent behind the act of 1956. (Para 3 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. interpretation of a customer’s liability under the act. (Para 15 , 17 , 25) |
| 4. judicial precedent and reasoning regarding customer culpability. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 24) |
| 5. court's final ruling on the application. (Para 46) |
JUDGMENT :
For the purposes to meet out the gravamen of arguments as it has been extended by the learned counsel for the applicant, and the judgments, which he has relied upon, to oust the engagement of the present applicant from commission of offence under Sections 3 , 4, 5, 6, and 7 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (hereinafter to be called as “the Act of 1956”), and for the offence under Section 3 70 of IPC, as it was registered against him, by way of an FIR No. 143 of 2023 on 13.03.2023, before Police Station, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar, which consequently upon the culmination of investigation had resulted into submission of the Chargesheet, being Chargesheet No. 228 of 2023 dated 10.05.2023, on account of which, the present applicant has been summoned to be tried by the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
