Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SIBO SANKAR MISHRA
Bikash Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual basis of the case (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. legal provisions and definitions outlined (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments by the petitioners (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. counterarguments by the state (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. court's assessment of evidence and case viability (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. final disposition of the case (Para 15 , 16) |
1. An FIR No. 212 dated 19.05.2018 in UPD, Bhubaneswar Capital Police Station was registered against many accused persons under Sections 3 , 4, 5, 6 and 7 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. The present petitioners were also named in the FIR. The allegations against the petitioners in the FIR in precise were that being the customers, they were availing services from a Spa Centre. Under the guise of running a Spa Centre, a brothel is being run from the same place. One Surendra Kumar Mohapatra under the managership of Sanjay Kumar Rana was running the Spa in the name and style of “H2O Spa And Hamam”. It is alleged that they procure the girls and using them for prostitution. On 19.05.2018 a raid was conducted by the Police, eight young girls were found inside the Spa, out of them seven girls were found to have been doing sexual activitie
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
