IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
Jaipal Singh - Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand through/Chief Secretary Government of Uttarakhand Dehradun and Others - Respondents
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 749 of 2010
Decided On : 24-08-2023
Government Grants Act - Succession of Lease Rights - Section 3 of the Government Grants Act, Section 105 and 108 of the Transfer of Property Act
Fact of the Case:
The case involved a dispute over the succession of lease rights under the Government Grants Act. The petitioner claimed succession rights based on adoption and a will executed by the principal lessee.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that an unregistered adoption deed has no legal sanctity and cannot confer succession rights. It also ruled that the lease under the Government Grants Act only confers a right of enjoyment, not inheritable title.
Issues: The issues involved the validity of succession rights based on adoption and a will under the Government Grants Act, and the interpretation of relevant legal provisions.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the lease under the Government Grants Act only grants a right of enjoyment, not inheritable title, and that an unregistered adoption deed has no legal validity. It also highlighted the requirement for registration of adoption deeds under the Registration Act.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the petitioner had no legal right to succeed the lease rights under the Government Grants Act.
JUDGMENT :
This writ petition has been preferred initially by Mr. Jaipal Singh, who claimed himself to be the successor of late Mr. Rajendra Singh, but upon his death, his heirs have been substituted as petitioner Nos. 1/1 to 1/3.
2. This case engages consideration of a very interesting issue, as to whether with regard to the leases granted under the provisions of the Government Grants Act, the rights over the property thus leased could at all be devolved upon by virtue of personnel right of succession or by virtue of an adoption allegedly claimed to have been made by the principal lessee in favour of Mr. Jaipal Singh?
3. Facts of the case are that a lease under the provisions of Government Grants Act was executed in favour of one Mr. Rajendra Singh in relation to two khasras, being Khasra No. 158/1, having an area of 0.626 hectares and khasra No. 4/6, having an area of 0.190 hectares. As per the provisions contained under Section 3 of the Government Grants Act, and particularly, in the context of its U.P. amendment, the leases which are granted under the provisions of the Government Grants Act, they are to be exclusively governed as per the tenor of lease in itself and nothing beyond that. Lease exclusively within itself is not a document which grants a right or title which could be given by will, because as per the provisions contained under Sections 105 of Transfer of Property Act, which defines lease, , the liability of the lessee would be exclusively governed under the provisions contained under Section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 which are extracted hereunder:-
108. Rights and liabilities of lessor and lessee.—In the absence of a contract or local usage to the contrary, the lessor and the lessee of immoveable property, as against one another, respectively, possess the rights and are subject to the liabilities mentioned in the rules next following, or such of them as are applicable to the property leased:—
(A) Rights and Liabilities of the Lessor
(a) The lessor is bound to disclose to the lessee any material defect in the property, with reference to its intended use, of which the former is and the latter is not aware, and which the latter could not with ordinary care discover;
(b) the lessor is bound on the lessee’s request to put him in possession of the property;
(c) the lessor shall be deemed to contract with the lessee that, if the latter pays the rent reserved by the lease and performs the contracts binding on the lessee, he may hold the property during the time limited by the lease without interruption. The benefit of such contract shall be annexed to and go with the lessee’s interest as such, and may be enforced by every person in whom that interest is for the whole or any part thereof from time to time vested.
(B) Rights and Liabilities of the Lessee
(d) If during the continuance of the lease any accession is made to the property, such accession (subject to the law relating to alluvion for the time being in force) shall be deemed to be comprised in the lease;
(e) if by fire, tempest or flood, or violence of an army or of a mob, or other irresistible force, any material part of the property be wholly destroyed or rendered substantially and permanently unfit for the purposes for which it was let, the lease shall, at the option of the lessee, be void: Provided that, if the injury be occ
The main legal point established is that lease rights under the Government Grants Act are limited to a right of enjoyment and do not confer inheritable title. Additionally, an unregistered adoption d....
The creation of tenancy rights must comply with the lease terms under the Government Grants Act.
The court ruled that an unregistered lease does not confer rights, and amendments changing the nature of a petition are impermissible if no enforceable rights exist.
A lease granted by the Government to lessees, deemed a Government grant under applicable statutory provisions, is exempt from compulsory registration under certain conditions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.