SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Deepak Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA, J.
1. Before dealing with the facts and arguments, which have been extended by the learned counsel for the applicant, it will be apt to observe as to the manner in which the relief has been modulated by the learned counsel for the applicant, which is extracted hereunder:
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding private respondents not to interfere in the personal life and liberty of the petitioners.
(iii) Issue or pass any other and further order or direction which this Hon’ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
2. In fact under the garb of the C482 application, an attempt, which has been made by the learned counsel for the applicant, is to direct the police authorities to reinvestigate into the matter pertaining to the set of allegations which had been leveled in the FIR No. 33 of 2022, dated 28.04.2022, as it was got registered by the complainant/respondent under sections 376 and 506 of IPC, at Police Station Jh
Gudalure M.J. Cherian and Others vs. Union of India and Others
K. Chandrasekhar vs. State of Kerala
Mithabhai Pashabhai Patel and Others vs. State of Gujarat
Nirmal Singh Kahlon vs. State of Punjab and Others
Ramachandran vs. R. Udhayakumar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.