RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Mahesh Chandra – Appellant
Versus
District Magistrate – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAVINDRA MAITHANI, J.
1. By means of instant petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:
(ii) Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
(iii) Award cost of the petition.”
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. It is a case of the petitioner that he was informed by the respondent no. 2 General Manager, Power Grid Corporation India Ltd. (“Corporation”) that a electric line is to be drawn through his property for which purpose 652 eucalyptus trees were to be cut. The petitioner was told that he would be compensated for the same. The trees were cut, but the petitioner was not paid the compensation despite repeated requests. When the respondents tried to erect the towers and raise the line, the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.