IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
RITU BAHRI, CJ., ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.
In the matter of Capital Punishment awarded to Harmeet Singh
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
Criminal Reference No. 04 Of 2021 With Criminal Appeal No. 440 Of 2021
Decided On : 09-07-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction of harmeet singh for multiple murders. (Para 1) |
| 2. conviction based on evidence during diwali festival murder case. (Para 2) |
| 3. facts surrounding the diwali incident and subsequent events. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 4. testimonies and evidence presented during trial. (Para 8 , 10 , 12) |
| 5. blood evidence and corroboration through forensic reports. (Para 13 , 15) |
| 6. discussion of mental health evaluation and its implications. (Para 18 , 20 , 22) |
| 7. clarification of legal versus medical insanity. (Para 25 , 26 , 29) |
| 8. legal standards for determining insanity under ipc. (Para 36 , 38 , 40) |
| 9. implications of mental illness on legal responsibility. (Para 46 , 48) |
| 10. last-seen theory implications in murder conviction. (Para 60) |
| 11. final verdict of conversion of conviction and sentence. (Para 63) |
| 12. final order regarding the conviction and sentencing of harmeet singh. (Para 64 , 65 , 67) |
JUDGMENT:
(Ritu Bahri, CJ.) :
The appellant-Harmeet Singh has come up in appeal against the judgment and order dated 04/05.10.2021, whereby he has been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 302 , 307 and 316 IPC. He has been awarded death sentence also directed to pay fine of Rs. 50,000 under Section 302 IPC. Aforesaid convict has been further convicted under Section 307 IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for 10 years and also directed to pay fine of Rs 25,000/-and also convicted under Section 316 IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for 10 years and also directed to pay fine of Rs 25,000/-.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant, at the outset, does not want to challenge the judgment rendered by the Trial Court on merits. The appellant has committed the murder. She has stated that there were sufficient evidence to prove that the appellant had committed the murder of Jai Singh (father of the accused), Ms. Kulwant Kaur (step mother of the accused), Ms. Harjeet Kaur (adopted daughter of Jai Singh), and Ms. Sukhmani (daughter of Ms. Harjeet Kaur).
3. Briefly, the facts of the case are that it was Diwali festival in 2014. At that time, Ms. Harjeet Kaur was 8-9 months pregnant and had come to the house of Jai Singh along with her son Kanwal and daughter Sukhmani. On the night of Diwali, everyone burst crackers and slept.
4. On 24.10.2014, at around 10:30 AM, P.W.3 Raji Devi informed P.W.1 Ajit Singh, who lodged the First Information Report, that Harmeet Singh (accused) was not opening the gate and was refusing to let her do the household work. P.W.1 Ajit Singh called his uncle Jai Singh, and on the insistence of P.W.1 Ajit Singh, the accused Harmeet Singh opened the gate and P.W.3 Raji Devi went inside the house to work, and came out screaming “khoon khoon”. After hearing the screaming of P.W.3 Raji Devi, P.W.1 Ajit Singh and his wife went inside the house of Jai Singh, and they found Ms. Kulwant Kaur and Ms. Harjeet Kaur were lying dead, soaked in blood, in the bedroom adjacent to the lobby. The dead body of the little girl Sukhmani was lying on the bed, drenched in blood. Blood soaked body of Jai Singh was lying face down on the floor in the room of the accused Harmeet Singh. The accused Harmeet Singh was standing there and P.W.4 Kanwal come from behind Harmeet Singh in an injured state. P.W.1 Ajit Singh picked up Kanwal and informed about the incident on 100 and 108 from his mobile. On being asked, the victim Kanwal told P.W.1 Ajit Singh that Harmeet uncle (accused) killed his maternal grandfather (Jai Singh), maternal grandmother (Ms. Kulwant Kaur), mother (Ms. Harjeet Kaur) and sister Sukhmani, and also stabbed him from behind.
5. After registration of FIR (Exhibit A-9), tehrir (Exhibit A-1) was submitted at P.S. Cantt on 24.10.2014 at 11:45 AM. Investigating Officer P.W.21 Vinod Kumar Jetha went to the spot of incident and took possession of some blood from the blood clots spread on the floor and a piece of blood stained bedsheet, sofa cloth, and pillow cover and prepared memo as Exhibit A-52, Exhibit A-54 respectively. Accused Ha
D.G. Thakker V. State of Gujarat
Ramreddy Rajesh Khanna Reddy vs. State of A.P.
Devidas Loka Rathod vs. State of Maharashtra
Dahyabhai Chhaganbhai Thakkar Vs State of Gujarat
Dahyabhai Chhaganbhai Thakkar Vs State of Gujarat
Surendra Mishra vs. State of Jharkhand
State of Rajasthan vs. Shera Ram
Ratan Lal Vs State of M.P. (1970) 3 SCC 533
Prakash Nayi alias Sen Vs State of Goa
Rupesh Manger (Thapa) Vs State of Sikkim
Surendra Mishra vs. State of Jharkhand
Hari Singh Gond vs. State of M.P. (2008) 16 SCC 109
The court ruled that a defendant's claim of mental illness must meet the standard of legal insanity, with no relief unless it can be proven that they lacked understanding of their actions during the ....
If accused was not able to establish conclusively that he was insane at time he committed offence, evidence placed before Court by accused or by prosecution may raise a reasonable doubt in mind of Co....
Point of Law : Once, a person is found to be suffering from mental disorder or mental deficiency, which takes within its ambit hallucinations, dementia, loss of memory and self-control, at all releva....
The appeal highlighted that an accused can be absolved of criminal liability if proven to be unsound of mind at the time of offense, adhering to S. 84 IPC.
(1) Mental insanity of accused – Existence of an unsound mind is a sine qua non to applicability of provision – Mere unsound mind per se would not suffice, and it should be to the extent of not knowi....
A person with a significant mental illness, at the time of the offence, may be deemed incapable of criminal responsibility under IPC Section 84.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.