SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(UK) 187

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Harish Bisht – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Mr. Gopal K. Verma, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. S.K. Pandey.

JUDGMENT :

(Ravindra Maithani, J.) :

Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No. 03 of 2024, under Section 8/20/60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station Satpuli, District Pauri Garhwal. He has sought his release on bail.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. According to the FIR, on 05.03.2024, the police were on patrolling duty, they were checking the vehicle, a car driven by the applicant reached at the spot, in the front passenger seat, the applicant has kept a bag. The Bag had 21 Kg. ganja in it. According to the FIR, from the rear seat also 9.400 Kg. ganja was also recovered from the co-accused.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that, in fact, the exact weight of the contraband is not given in the FIR. It is highly improbable that a person while driving a vehicle would hold something with his hand. The co-accused has already been granted bail.

5. Learned State counsel would submit that the weight of the recovered article was done in the court and as per report, it was 20 kg. and 220 gram ganja that was recovered from the applicant. Out of which, 200 gram sample was sent for analysis.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top