IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, PANKAJ PUROHIT, JJ.
Dr. Harish Chandra Tiwari - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and Others - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 67 of 2021 (S/B)
Decided On : 05-07-2024
Employment - Associate Professor - Government Order - Pay Scale Discrepancy - The court interpreted the relevant government orders and regulations, concluding that the petitioner was appointed under the correct pay scale as per the established guidelines, thus denying the claim for a higher pay scale.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to quash government orders that denied him a higher pay scale for the position of Associate Professor, claiming the advertisement promised a higher salary than what was offered upon appointment.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner was appointed according to the correct pay scale as per the government order, and the discrepancy in the advertisement was a clerical error that did not entitle the petitioner to a higher pay scale.
Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to the pay scale of Rs.37400-67000 as advertised, despite the appointment being made under a different government order.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the pay scale is determined by government orders, and the petitioner cannot claim a higher pay scale based on an erroneous advertisement.
Result: The writ petition is dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs :
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction appropriate in the nature by calling the entire record of Government Order No.226/XLII-1/2020-06(05) 2010 Sanskrit Shiksha Anubhag Dehradun dated 30.06.2020, so far as it relates to the petitioner and declare the same to be arbitrary, unreasonable and nonest in the eyes of law.
(iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the office memorandum dated 02.12.2020 issued by respondent No.7 (contained as annexure no.19 to the writ petition)
(iv) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents authority to grant/accord the Pay Scale of Rs.37400-67000 with AGP Rs.9,000/- to the petitioner on the post of Associate Professor (Sahitya) in the respondent university from the date his joining/appointment i.e.15.09.2016.
(v) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents authorities to pay the difference of salary of pay scale with prevailing interest thereon from the date of appointment till such period the petitioner has actually been granted the pay scale of Rs.37400-67000 with AGP Rs.9,000/- to the post of Associate Professor (Sahitya) by the respondent authorities.
2. Petitioner responded to an advertisement dated 22.04.2015 issued by the Uttarakhand Sanskrit University by submitting application for the post of Associate Professor. Petitioner was selected and appointed as Associate Professor, vide order dated 29.08.2016.
3. According to the petitioner, in advertisement the pay-scale for the post of Associate Professor was mentioned as Rs.37400-67000 – AGP Rs.8000/-, however he was appointed in a lower pay scale i.e. Rs.15600-39100-AGP Rs.8,000/-. This, according to petitioner, is unjust and illegal and he is entitled to the pay-scale as was mentioned in the advertisement.
4. In Para 15 of the writ petition, the following averment has been made :
5. Mr. Girish Kumar Awasthi, Registrar Uttarakhand Sanskrit University has filed counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos.6 & 7. Para 6 of the said counter affidavit is reproduced below :
It is relevant to mention here that in the advertisement number 01/2015 dated 22-04-2015, the scale of Associate Professor was mentioned Rs.37400-67000 with AGP 8000 (pay band was wrongly typed in the advertisement however the grade pay is right), which is actually Rs.15600-39100 with AGP 8000 in terms of Government of Uttarakhand GO No.158/ XXIV-4/2011-6(5)-2010, Sanskrit S
A clerical error in an advertisement does not confer entitlement to a higher pay scale than what is established by government orders.
The central legal point established is that the duties and responsibilities of the promoted posts determine the entitlement to higher pay scale, as per relevant rules.
Statutory rights of employees cannot be revoked without valid reasons, and pending amendments do not justify withdrawal of established pay scales.
The court emphasized the principle of equal pay for equal work, ruling that the petitioners were entitled to the same pay scale as their counterparts in other universities due to administrative error....
The court ruled that arbitrary recovery of excess pay is barred after eight years without evidence of wrongdoing, following established principles under Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution.
Legal entitlement to pay scales depends on prescribed qualifications, emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles in administrative decisions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.