JUDGMENT :

RAVINDRA MAITHANI, J.

1. The challenge in this revision is made to the Judgment and Order dated 06.09.2023, passed in Case No. 50 of 2017, Smt. Gargi Kar and Another vs. Kirti Bhushan Mishra, by the court of Additional Judge, Family Court, Roorkee, District Haridwar (“the case”), by the impugned judgment and order, the revisionist has been directed to pay Rs. 25,000/- to the respondent no. 2 and Rs. 20,000/- per month to the respondent no. 3, as maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“the Code”).

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. The case is based on an application filed under Section 125 of the Code filed by the respondent no. 2 (“the wife”) and the respondent no. 3 (“the son”) against the revisionist. Briefly stated, according to it, the revisionist and the respondent no. 2 were married on 08.12.2010. But, after marriage, the respondent no. 2 was harassed and tortured in connection with demand of dowry. The revisionist would consider the respondent no. 2 as material and would commit sexual intercourse against the order of nature with her which had adverse effect on her health. The revisionist had no mercy on