SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(UK) 33

PANKAJ PUROHIT
Vijay Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Vinay Kumar.
For the Respondent: Narayan Dutt.

JUDGMENT :

PANKAJ PUROHIT, J.

1. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought indulgence of this Court for a direction to quash the order dated 23.01.2018, passed by Secretary, Tourism, Government of Uttarakhand, whereby claim of the petitioner for regularization of his services on the post of Lecturer in Government Hotel Management and Catering Institute, Almora.

2. Facts of the case shorn-off unnecessary details are that the petitioner pursuant to an advertisement submitted his candidature for the post of a contractual position of Lecturer (Front Office). The petitioner was selected after facing an interview and was engaged as Contractual Lecturer (Front Office) with respondent no. 4, in the year 1997.

3. It is case of the petitioner that the petitioner was engaged as Contractual Lecturer with respondent no. 4 against a sanctioned and vacant post and the petitioner fulfills the qualification for the said post undisputedly. The petitioner after promulgation of the Daily Wages, Work-Charge, Fixed Pay Scale, Part Time and Ad-hoc Employees Regularization Rules, 2013 (for short “Regularization Rules, 2013”) made a representation to respondent no. 4 on 17.01.2014 for regulariz

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top