Bhupendra Pant vs Neelam Pant - 2024 Supreme(UK) 142

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(UK) 142

RITU BAHRI, RAKESH THAPLIYAL
Bhupendra Pant – Appellant
Versus
Neelam Pant – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Devesh Upreti, learned counsel
For the Respondent: Mr. Yogesh Pant, learned counsel

JUDGMENT :

Ritu Bahri, C.J.

The present appeal has been filed by the appellant-husband against the impugned judgment and decree dated 16.08.2022 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Haldwani, District Nainital in Civil Case No. 02/2017 “Shri Bhupendra Pant v. Smt. Neelam Pant”.

2. The marriage of the parties was solemnized on 03.02.1991. There is no child from the marriage, and both the parties are living separately since 1999. The marriage between the parties is a dead marriage in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

3. The relevant details of the present appeal are as follows :-

Date of marriage.	03rd February, 1991
Date of separation.	March, 1999
Details of the criminal proceedings between the parties.	No criminal proceedings.
Issues from the marriage.	None.
Decision of the Family Court.	Petition of the appellant-husband, under Section 13 (1-A)(ii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, was dismissed vide order dated 16.08.2022
Maintenance decided by the Family Court.	No maintenance has been given.
Reliance placed on the judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.	1. Samar Ghosh v.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(UK) 142

RITU BAHRI, RAKESH THAPLIYALBhupendra Pant – AppellantVersusNeelam Pant – Respondent

RITU BAHRI, RAKESH THAPLIYAL
Bhupendra Pant – Appellant
Versus
Neelam Pant – Respondent